Subject: RE: Open response to Nathan Peachy, please share statewide To the full Jural Assembly of the Pennsylvania free state and Nathan Peachy;

Subject: RE: Open response to Nathan Peachy, please share statewide



To the full Jural Assembly of the Pennsylvania free state and Nathan Peachy;



This is my response to Nathan’s correspondence on July 13, 2011. My choice, and my encouragement for others to do the same, is to send a public response so that “We the People” can share equally in all our considerations and thereby avoid the elements of gossip, heresay and misconstrued, out of context, manipulations of intent.



Nathan, we can only guess why this would be your, “last letter to “Mark Lounsbury” as part of the entire group in Pennsylvania in free state”. You have not made this clear, nor addressed this communication to anyone other than “Mark Lounsbury”. What exactly do you mean, “in” free state?



You could not have had a full Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly on Saturday, as there is no such thing. The rightful assembly would have been the Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly.


The assembly you led was an unlawful usurpation of authority of which you were informed before the offense, by lawful officials, which you trained and assisted in writing the By-Laws for the Pennsylvania free state Jural Assembly. The same individuals whom you have severely vilified in your communication.



The more than half of the numbers gathered that day who departed, refusing to sit through the calling to order of an unauthorized assembly, did so in honor of the hard work already accomplished in Pennsylvania, leaving you to dishonor yourself and those few who remained, to continue an unsanctioned and unlawful attempt to do official business without even a quorum present.



Let us be clear, this departure had nothing to do with fear of contract and everything to do with honorability. The de facto fear process you describe is called monetizing and requires a signature.



I notice in this description, that you criticize de facto thinking and programming, yet, you refer to this republic as the, United States of America, which is the de facto representation, as we all well know.



You were informed of the problem, reminded of proper procedures and your position, all of which you chose to ignore. In my opinion, government officials have a responsibility to hold themselves to a higher standard than those whom they lead, not set an example of total disregard for standards they themselves have helped to set for all, in the spirit of true sovereign government.



You have received the benefit of direct, personal communication from the people about whom you speak as though they were traitors, informing you of exactly what their thoughts and feelings have been in your regard. I hope they will now repeat those thoughts and feelings publicly for the benefit of all.



You have no authority to go forward with any supposed resolutions made at your unofficial meeting on July 9. 2011 and any government that would accept such resolutions under such circumstances would be suspect as de facto and empirical to me.



I do not know Nathan Peachy personally at all. However, my direct, personal experience of him is that he is purposely unclear in his communications. He makes accusations without either the benefit of undisputable facts, or making any attempt to verify such statements from their source. His presentations are obviously designed to lead his listeners to make conclusions based on prejudice, emotion, and religious doctrine rather than fact, equity, and law. His communication to which this response is made has produced a lie, either in his representation of his July 9 meeting on July 9, or in his representation of it in this correspondence. At that meeting I specifically  asked him, “Are you saying you are holding here a Jural Assembly for the Republic for the united States of America?”. His reply was then, yes, while he is now reporting to have held what he is calling a Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly. So, I also am confused, now as then, as to the true motives behind this move on our state. There are at least 3 recordings of events up to the moment most of the people in attendance departed. This would certainly be evidence admissible in court.  



I have personal experience being privy to a conversation in which Mr Peachy was, in my estimation, insulting and belittling to Wil Spencer in an effort to find information out about Jim Wright, rather than speaking to Jim. In the same conversation he admitted advising Tim Turner not to fulfill on a promise to provide his oath of office, made to a group of Pennsylvanians on a group call, on the basis that we do not have any real government at all, so that fulfilling such promises is unnecessary and neither Nathan nor Tim Turner will be producing their oaths. This conversation has been recorded and transcribed.



All of this aside, it is extremely important that we all remember the several good reasons that brought us together in the common spirit of restoring America. Pennsylvanians have proven themselves to be strong in their convictions to both  a sovereign nation as well as to one another. Regardless of the problem or the upset, our hearts do not change, nor does the fact that, united we stand . . .



Delanne Walts





From: Nathan Peachey [mailto:n.peachey@republicoftheunitedstates.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 8:49 AM
To: 'Mark Lounsbury'
Subject: Pennsylvania issue





This is my last email to you as part of the entire  group in Pennsylvania in free state.

We have met on Saturday and we had a full Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly.

A handful of them were there obviously to not participate, but to demonstrate. But they left before we started.

Their demonstration was that they were not going to cooperate with the Pennsylvania Republic Jural Assembly and they left before we got started because it was asked of them to identify themselves and they felt that was making a contract.

Many people have de facto thinking. Everything they can think of when you ask of them something is….me,me,my.

The de facto contracts with us by asking us our name and then they turn around and make instruments which they sell on Wall Street and make money.

Somehow some people in the Republic are so warped in their thinking that the moment you want to know their name they think in those terms.

We do not do that. We do not go and take peoples houses away and put them in prison, or take their families away when they do not give us their names. Why are people so warped in their thinking?

All they can think of is de facto and the only defence they can think about to use is a de facto defense.

The de facto has the American people trained that way and well enough to not work together united enough, that they think that we are never able to resurrect the United States of America and the Constitution back to law. And they are almost right.

We have done a lot of things wrong, but we are always willing to make them right if they are shown to us in a way we can understand.

But when people fail to communicate with each other, then we cannot understand each other.

Here in Pennsylvania I had traveled a lot and was not home this Spring.

When I came home this early summer and wanted to find out how Pennsylvania is doing, what used to be some of my friends such as Steve Shelly which I trusted and Al Tarkka the Ambassador, I was shocked.

My friends had turned against me. All of a sudden I was the bad guy. I was the one not fit to be around or not worthy to even communicate with.

Then we find out that Will Spencer is running the country trying to get evidence to bring down the Republic.

Then we find out that there is an apparent form of secrecy among some of the people in Pennsylvania to not talk but to try to bring down the national.

Will Spencer the Grand Jury foreman labels us the crime family. I would be the first one that needs to know about any crime but yet he does not talk to me about it.

I am confused. So I decided to start to see if I can do something about it.

All I wanted to do was find out what the problem was and go from there. It appeared that some of you were under some kind of secrecy to not talk.

Yet some pass emails around and slander the Republic officials and I see many emails that people pass back and forth and they slander and write evil against each other, yet they never have met the people they write evil against.

How can you do that?



The Pennsylvania Jural Assembly has made Resolutions on July 9 2011. They will stand if the rebellion in Pennsylvania is the problem. However if I am the problem I need to know about it and the Republic needs to know about it.

We are going to give every opportunity for you to express yourself and let yourself be heard and share with the National what our problem here in Pennsylvania is, and if I am the problem, I need to know about it and they do too.

If I am your problem they need to know about it. I need to know about it. Because I am not about to continue the office of Chief Justice if I am the problem.

Steve Shelly and Al Tarkka have went and they ask people, DO YOU LIKE NATHAN?

This was an attempt to create a conspiracy so they could get rid of me, is the way I take that, but if it is not and if they have a good reason to for their actions, that then they need to be heard.

I love them and have always respected them. But if I am wrong about it and I am the problem, the Republic needs to know.

I love Jim Wright and marvel at his ability to deal with court issues and there is not a single person in the whole world that I would rather have to cover my back end in a court room then Jim Wright and his friends.

And I want to always remain friends but we cannot have a rebellious and divided house in Pennsylvania. But if I am the problem the Republic needs to know about it.

So I am going to give all of you in Pennsylvania the opportunity to have your voices heard to the Republic national about me, because if Al and Steve Shelly have a good reason to want to get rid of me as the Chief Justice, you need to know about it and so does the whole nation. That good reason they have, needs to be brought to the attention to the Judiciary Committee and House and Senate and they need to know about that reason for the sake of the nation.

We have made resolutions in Pennsylvania Jural Assembly that will be carried out, but I am going to put that on hold for ten (10) days and give all of you the opportunity to speak up and let your voices be heard first.

When the ten (10) days are over, the House will have to act on that information about me appropriately. They will submit this information to the Judiciary Committee which can then start an impeachment process to the House if they have the verifiable sufficient

evidence to do that. And they will and I will submit to that. But they need sufficient evidence. Email remarks and slander is not good enough to impeach a Justice. They need verifiable evidence. They are there to protect the Republic and they will.





Here are the following questions that you need to answer and send to the following SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE.

He will gather all the information and act upon it appropriately.





Before the Restore America Plan, how well have you known Nathan Joel Peachey personally?

(This means personal, not some email blog)

Please describe his character to the best of your ability.

Has he done things to you or someone else that have not been made right you are aware of that would disqualify him as the Chief Justice?

Would you be able to provide court admissible evidence to anything about him that would disqualify him as a Chief Justice?



Since the start of the Restore America Plan and the Republic how well do you know Nathan Joel Peachey personally?

(This means personal, not some email blog)

Please describe his character as you know him personally?

What has he done that you can verify with court admissible evidence before the Judiciary Committee that you feel would disqualify as a Chief Justice?



The deadline to answer these questions is July 23 2011.



Farewell

May God Bless You

Nathan Joel Peachey Chief Justice



Please send all your emails and information to Mark Lounsbury Speaker of the House.

m.lounsbury@republicoftheunitedstates.org