Friday, February 11, 2011


wovolve42 on February 11, 2011 @ 10:18 am
Thanks for the kudos. If true, the fact that the bloodline
of Jesus still exists is amazing and even more surprising is how it ties into the NWO or I should say, how it is in direct competition with the NWO. I never knew the difference between a constitutional monarchy & a parliamentary monarchy before I read the book. The fact that this information is being suppressed, suggests it is true and important. Little did I know 15 years ago that Princess Diana was the real deal and then some. If the knowledge that Queen Elizabeth was a usurper to the throne got out, it could bring her down and the corporations that use the monarchy as a front for their illegitimate dealings might go with it.
Apparently Jesus foretold there would be a revealing time, which appears to be now. Jordan Maxwell and David Icke claim Jesus never existed. The book maintains that Jesus is an historical figure as well as a religious one. Much of what Icke says I find helpful and interesting, except his rejection of Jesus. I’ve heard Icke is a Mason. If as the book maintains, the Merovingian bloodline stands against the new world order, then one way to deal with them is to put them out of existence, historically speaking. Perhaps this is Icke’s job, as well as Jordan Maxwell’s.
The book, also, maintains that Jesus was every bit a human figure, but that the Catholic Church emphasized the divine so as to co-opt his place in history. Apparently, he was seeking to overthrow the Romans and that is why he was so well received on Palm Sunday and that is why they allege he was crucified for trying to overthrow the Roman Empire.
My personal belief is that he never was crucified but that he journeyed to India because all along that route he took there are converts and his tomb is allegedly in India, where there are many landmarks named after him. Of course, we don’t get that info here.
It is, also, of interest that Adrian Salbuchi emphasizes the feminine’s importance in dealing with the NWO. I’ve noticed in the past that mother (protective figures), like Cindy Sheehan, are absolutely excoriated by the media. It never made sense to me, but now I think it’s due to fear that this archetype could bring them down. Think how virtually all Hollywood stereotypes & Elite females are bankrupt in this quality given the child molestation and brainwashing of their own children. The Grail Princess Diana possessed the archetypal mother protective power in hearts….
For Diana to have gotten all the publicity she did, the book claims she must have had unseen help behind the scenes, help that wanted the Windsor Monarchy brought down & replaced. Prince William stands as their hope…

No comments: