Re: Comment by Rafael Edgar Neville Morales on March 18, 2011 @ 11:24 am
>Freedom is okay, but, if everyone’s allowed to carry arms, I wanna be allowed
>to carry plutonium pellets, complex abrasive chemicals and run around naked.
>What’s the limit in freedom?
This is where I put on my Republic training hat and talk about common law… *grin*
This is what the Republic concept is all about, Freedom… Freedom to do what you want, but the limit is when you affect others. The core principal under Common Law is that if there is no victim, there is no crime. So… That mean if you wanted to cover yourself in abrasive complex chemicals or run around naked, you would have the right to do that. But, if you wanted to carry plutonium pellets, that would affect others so you would not be allowed to do that outside of your own property.
Is it perfect? No, but it is freedom, and the Republic government will fight to ensure you keep those freedoms.
>So what you are telling me is that america’s streets are very insecure,
>so much, you might need to kill someone…
You are basing that thought off of the defacto corporate government, not the Republic. Two completely different things. In the disgraced America that the corporate government has created, the streets are unsecure because they want them that way. They take away the guns from the law abiding citizens and give them to the criminals. Do not use that as the example of what America will be in the future, that is what we are trying to move away from.
>I truly do not understand the right to carry guns.
>If I went around with a sword on my belt, I would get arrested.
>So I doubt there is an amendment that backs me up.
In the original version of America (before the corporate government took over, and what we are returning to), you could walk around with a sword on your belt if you wanted to. As long as you do not use it on someone, it is not a crime. The second amendment to our constitution allows for that. The same thing goes with guns… You have the right to own and carry them, but if you use them on someone else it becomes a crime.
That is what the Republic is all about, true freedom, something we haven’t seen for a long-long time.
>Freedom is okay, but, if everyone’s allowed to carry arms, I wanna be allowed
>to carry plutonium pellets, complex abrasive chemicals and run around naked.
>What’s the limit in freedom?
This is what the Republic concept is all about, Freedom… Freedom to do what you want, but the limit is when you affect others. The core principal under Common Law is that if there is no victim, there is no crime. So… That mean if you wanted to cover yourself in abrasive complex chemicals or run around naked, you would have the right to do that. But, if you wanted to carry plutonium pellets, that would affect others so you would not be allowed to do that outside of your own property.
>so much, you might need to kill someone…
>If I went around with a sword on my belt, I would get arrested.
>So I doubt there is an amendment that backs me up.